Stanford University · TAPS · June 2013 · Vol. XIX · psi-web.org
Performance Studies International
Over a hundred performances. Document the undocumentable. Photograph the ephemeral. Stand there with your camera while people turn themselves inside out.
Stanford, California — PSi #19 — Roble Gym & Environs — June 2013
Performance Studies international #19… Over a hundred performances, a hundred, and I'm supposed to what, exactly? Freeze them? Like trying to can lightning, bottle smoke, take a knife to the ocean and carve out a piece to take home… That one-second piece is already gone before my shutter even clicks. And the nineteen-hour endurance thing? Am I expected to be there for the whole degradation, the whole beautiful, excruciating arc of someone breaking themselves down for… what? Understanding? Transcendence? A line on their CV?
PSi#19
Performance Studies International · Stanford University · TAPS · Roble Gym · Stanford, California · June 2013
100+Performances19Artists documented here72Hours. Approximate.1Photographer. Still breathing.
Here's what kills me about this whole enterprise: performance art is the most honest con job there is. It's designed to disappear. That's the whole fucking point. The moment happens, it burns, and then it's just memory and argument and somebody's half-assed description at a bar three years later. And I'm the guy trying to prove it existed.
The camera's a liar. It'll give evidence, sure. Proof of attendance. But it won't give you the smell of the space, the weird electricity when everyone realizes someone's about to do something genuinely dangerous or stupid or sublime. It won't give you that tightness in your chest when the performer's been at it for six hours and you can see them starting to crack.
The documentation isn't really about capturing it. It's about witnessing. I'm the guy who was there. My photographs are postcards from the edge of someone else's breakthrough or breakdown, and sometimes you can't tell which until years later. So I shoot it all. The pretentious garbage and the genuine article.
"Performance art is the most honest con job there is. It's designed to disappear. That's the whole fucking point."
So some guy restaged the choreography of a Roger Federer tennis match from November 6, 2012 — not the game itself, just the bodies moving through space — mixed with Proust's involuntary memory theories and whatever scraps people remembered about Antonin Artaud from his sister, his friends, his psychiatrist. Theatre as subtraction instead of addition. Pretentious as hell. But asking real questions about what remains when the moment's gone. Probably too smart for its own good. Definitely too smart for a Tuesday afternoon.
Gretchen Schiller built a fifteen-minute séance for place memory, where a soft-spoken librarian — because of course it's a librarian — guides you into a dim room full of custom-made furniture that doubles as audiovisual interfaces. You're supposed to touch things, catch things, hold onto "traces of place." The art-installation equivalent of ASMR. Precious, maybe. But probably exactly what people need after sitting through five panels about post-structuralist theory and the body politic. Sometimes the most radical thing you can do is whisper and let people touch stuff.
Ann Carlson rounded up people from all over the Stanford University campus — janitors, professors, lab techs, whoever — and turned their actual work movements into an orchestra, except instead of violins you get the gesture of someone pipetting samples or shelving books or mopping floors. Taking people who spend their days invisible, doing the repetitive movements that keep a place running, and saying: look, this is choreography, this is art, you've been dancing this whole time. It's democratic in a way most performance art isn't. Whether it actually works depends entirely on Carlson's ability to find the poetry in someone's third hour of data entry. But at least she's trying.
Margaret Tedesco sits in a semi-dark room and watches entire feature-length films with the sound off and the projection blocked by her own body, then just tells you what she's seeing — not the plot, not the names, just "she walks across the room, he touches the wall, they stand in blue light, it's night." Pronouns only. Could be maddening. Could be brilliant. Probably both. There's something genuine in the attempt: stripping away the apparatus of cinema to get at what remains when it's just one person trying to describe what light and bodies do in space.
The Office for Make Believe calls itself a "dream tank," which is San Francisco for "we'll take your half-baked fantasies seriously." For three days Tacata staged whatever gallery visitors wished for — turned their private mental movies into actual performances, photographs, videos, whatever form fit the particular delusion. Part therapy, part carnival, part con job in the best possible way. Someone says "I always imagined I'd…" and Tacata says "okay, let's do it right now with duct tape and a camcorder." Most of us spend our whole lives keeping our daydreams locked up. Ryan broke them out into the light for three days to see what happens.
232 times over ten hours and fourteen minutes. This was the second time she's done this. The math is what matters: one exchange every two-and-a-half minutes, no intermission, just this relentless rhythm of give-and-take. By exchange 47 you're numb. By 127 you're somewhere else entirely. By 200 you're a machine that exchanges, and the action has burned through meaning into pure repetition, pure endurance. By the end it wasn't about the exchange anymore. It was about lasting. About what happens when you do something so many times it stops being a choice and becomes a trance state.
Long Haul (abbreviated from The Omnibus — 30 hours)
Thirty goddamn hours of talking. Longer than most people can stay awake, longer than most marriages last. Now offering the "abbreviated version." And here's where it gets uncomfortable: Farquhar's up there talking about her childhood, her lovers, what she had for breakfast in 1987, the pattern on a curtain she once saw — then suddenly she's looking at me, talking about me, the guy with the camera who thought he was invisible. My camera's not a shield anymore — it's a prop in her show. No getting out.
Monologue · Duration · The Photographer Implicated
Singers and swimmers at the bottom of windswept cliffs where sand meets sea, pointed at the horizon. The singers can't breathe right — that's the point. The swimmers are in over their heads, literally. All staring out at the water like they're searching for someone who's never coming back. UK soprano Laura Wright, Jocelyn Pook's score. Bodies where they don't quite belong — singers without air, swimmers without solid ground — watching them reach for the unreachable anyway. We've all stood at that edge. We've all searched that horizon.
Site · Fort Funston · Cliff Edge · Laura Wright · Jocelyn Pook
Variazioni su un oggetto di scena (Variations on a Prop, 2002/05/07), for piano and stuffed toys. Var. XXII (Valsugana). Var. XI (Maridemi mi). Var. I (Reposare). Louganis (2007), for piano and TV/VCR combo. Video by Terry Berlier.
PSi #19 · Stanford · June 2013Jamie Lyons DocumentationContinued ↓
Also On The Bill Selected · not exhaustive · all of it mattered
Katharine Fry
Tomorrow We Will Run
Two women in front of a projected clock, trading "tick" and "tock" as the second hand goes around. An endless call-and-response with the machinery of measured time. It's a meditation on live versus recorded time, on whether bodies can ever really sync up with clocks. After about thirty seconds it stops mattering and you're just watching two people locked in mechanical dialogue with the universe's metronome. Hypnotic in the way only truly simple ideas can be. Also probably maddening. Tick. Tock. We're all just counting down to something.
Time · Bodies · Clock · Duration · Hypnosis
Kimberly Jannarone
Right-Wing Cabaret
One-hour cabaret where people actually performed fascist art — not critiqued it, not deconstructed it, but performed it — to spark debate about reactionary aesthetics. Either the bravest or stupidest thing you can do in an academic setting. The idea: you can't understand the seductive power of right-wing art unless you experience it working on you. You're betting the room is smart enough to see the critique. That's a hell of a bet. You can't fight what you won't look at. But you also can't un-ring a bell once it's rung.
Cabaret · Fascist Aesthetics · Risk · 1 Hour
Katharine Fry · Tomorrow We Will Run · Tick. Tock.
Michael Hunter and Derek Phillips resurrected Cage's 1949 Lecture on Nothing with a live soundtrack built from digitally mangled recordings of the actual space around the venue. Cage on Cage. Using his own strategies against his original work, making it site-specific seventy-something years later. Is this perfect or completely missing the point? Cage would probably approve, or laugh, or say it doesn't matter. The whole point was never doing it right.
COMPLAINT DESK — No artist name. No description. No manifesto about the semiotics of grievance or the performativity of bureaucratic frustration. Just those two words sitting there like a dare. Was it an actual desk where people filed complaints? Maybe it was someone literally sitting at a desk for six hours listening to academics whine about panel assignments and conference coffee. The fact that there's no explanation is either lazy documentation on my part or the most honest thing on this whole page. Sometimes art is just a desk. Sometimes a desk is enough. Sometimes you never find out what the hell anyone was thinking, and that's the piece.
"Guillermo Gómez-Peña showed up and did what he's been doing for decades — being the border personified."
Strange Democracy: Border Wars — Guillermo Gómez-Peña shifts between English and Spanish mid-sentence, becomes different people mid-thought, uses what the program notes call "techno-ideology" and "ethno-poetics" but what really amounts to throwing every weapon in his arsenal at the audience until something lands. He's talking about post-9/11 America, the border wars, the Minute Men with their lawn chairs and binoculars playing soldier, the three-ply fences that cost millions and stop nothing. A performance that refuses to let you get comfortable in any one language or identity or political position. Whether you need to hear it or not, whether you're ready or not, he's going to tell you. Loudly. In multiple languages. While wearing whatever the hell costume makes the point.
Julie Tolentino kept her mouth open in the shape of an O — the last kiss, the final gasp, ecstasy and death wearing the same face — while Stosh Fila dripped honey into it for hours. Hand recorders playing Vargas singing "Soledad" on loop, that drawn-out O of loneliness echoing Tolentino's open mouth. Fila's the one with power here: controlling the droplet's shape, the speed, the intensity, squeezing and advancing and withdrawing. It's dominance and submission, feeding and drowning, the ecstatic state that both creates and destroys you. Durational, they call it. Meaning it went on long enough for everyone watching to get deeply, profoundly uncomfortable with how much they wanted to keep watching.
Post-AIDS body as argument. Not the body with AIDS — the body after, the one that survived when it wasn't supposed to. Fourth return to this particular wound. Started this series working with Lawrence Steger, who didn't make it, died in the late 90s when dying was supposed to be over, when the cocktails were supposed to save everyone. Some of these performances happened at Leigh Bowery's funerals, plural, New York and Amsterdam. Running 1996 to 2007. Just a body on stage, still breathing, still bleeding, still asking: why are you still here?
Body Art · Post-AIDS · 1996–2007 · Leigh Bowery · Lawrence Steger
Sat inside a circle of forty Cambodian clay pots and broke them. One by one. Then put them back together. One by one. Forty times. The pots are Cambodian — that matters, that's not just exotic set dressing, that's history and craft and probably someone's livelihood turned into raw material for a performance about breaking and mending. By pot fifteen the sound of clay shattering has lost all meaning. By pot thirty you're a machine that breaks and fixes. Knowing you can glue the pieces together but it'll never be what it was. Forty times she learns that lesson. Forty times she does it anyway.
Two women, both named Rebecca, "considered" how the sun serves as "specter and collaborator" in their work as scholars and performers. The sun's both a ghost and a partner — haunting them and working with them simultaneously. Every performer knows the sun's a collaborator: it changes everything, the temperature, the visibility, the mood, how long you can last. Maybe the vagueness is the point. The sun doesn't explain itself either.
Took the Goldilocks story — breaking and entering, eating someone's porridge, napping in their bed — and turned it into a solo dance-song cycle about trespassing as sacred practice. Navigating rooms the way certain indigenous cultures navigate landscape: through repeated song, through singing the space into existence as you move through it. It's Goldilocks as spiritual practice. Some rooms you sing your way through. Some rooms you have to break into. Sometimes they're the same room.
Dance · Song · Goldilocks · Koken · Sacred Trespass
"Because in ten years, twenty, these images will be all that's left of people pouring themselves out. And even though the photographs lie, even though they can't capture the thing itself, they're still love letters. Evidence of passion."
Jamie Lyons · Spectaclism · PSi #19 Documentation · Stanford University · June 2013