- Hide menu

Heterogeneous Spectacles

Ai Weiwei @Large Alcatraz

Here’s a guy who couldn’t even show up to his own exhibit because the Chinese government had his passport. Think about that. They locked him down, kept him from leaving, and he responds by creating this massive installation about freedom and imprisonment in one of America’s most notorious prisons. That’s not just art. That’s a middle finger with purpose.

Ai Weiwei, Alcatraz, national parks, prison

The thing about Alcatraz is it’s already heavy with meaning before you add a single brushstroke. Those cells held some of America’s hardest criminals. Cold concrete, salt air, the impossible promise of San Francisco glittering across the water. But Weiwei understood something crucial: a cage is a cage, whether you’re in it for robbing banks or for speaking your mind.

Ai Wei Wei Alcatraz 2

There’s this piece called Trace where he used tea to create wallpaper patterns. Not paint. Tea. The kind of thing you might share with someone if you could sit down and talk like human beings. But instead of conversation, he gave us faces. More prisoners. More people locked away for inconvenient truths.

What gets me is the precision of it. Weiwei’s work doesn’t scream at you. It doesn’t need to. It just sits there in those cells, patient and undeniable, asking you to consider what freedom actually means. Not the flag-waving abstraction we throw around at barbecues, but the real thing. The dangerous thing. The thing that gets you disappeared or beaten or locked away.

Ai Wei Wei Alcatraz 1

The authorities who silenced him probably thought they were winning. Keep him home, control the narrative. But art doesn’t work that way. You can confiscate someone’s passport but you can’t stop their ideas from getting on a boat to Alcatraz and setting up shop in America’s most famous prison. That’s the whole point. Ideas move. They spread. They refuse to be contained.

ai weiwei, alcatraz, exhibit, art, artist, san francisco, documentation, photography, jamie lyons, national parks, prison

Thousands of people stood in those cells, looked at those faces made of Legos and dragon kites and old bicycle parts, and they got it. They understood that somewhere in Beijing, a man they’d never meet was being watched and harassed and restricted for the same impulses that Americans supposedly hold sacred.

That’s not comfortable. That’s not easy.

ai weiwei, alcatraz, exhibit, art, artist, san francisco, documentation, photography, jamie lyons

That’s exactly what art should be.

Ai Weiwei: @Large Alcatraz

My definition of art has always been the same. It is about freedom of expression, a new way of communication. It is never about exhibiting in museums or about hanging it on the wall. Art should live in the heart of the people. Ordinary people should have the same ability to understand art as anybody else. I don’t think art is elite or mysterious. I don’t think anybody can separate art from politics. The intention to separate art from politics is itself a very political intention.
 Ai Weiwei

Ray of Light Theater Yeast Nation

Victoria Theater, San Francisco: Yeast Nation (the triumph of life) presented by Ray of Light Theatre

Yeast Nation, ray of light theater, san francisco theater, theatre documentation, victoria theater, theater bay area, Angrette McCloskey

The Art of Our Necessities

Ava Roy, We Players John Hadden, We Players performance, We Players Shakespeare, We Players, King Fool, documentation, photography, marin headlands, jamie lyons, site integrated, site specific, theatre, theater, san francisco

 

Collaboration: three people trying to figure out how to make Shakespeare’s storm feel real when the actual wind off the Pacific is already doing half the work. We’re not building a set. We’re negotiating with architecture that predates us and will outlast us, trying to figure out where bodies should stand, how voices will carry through concrete, whether the audience walks this way or that way, whether they’re sheltered or exposed at any given moment.

And here’s what matters about working with people like Ava and John on something like this: there’s no bullshit budget between you and the work. No producers asking for design renderings. We’ve got concrete, rust, wind, actors, audience. That’s it. So every conversation becomes: what does this mean? Not “how do we indicate the heath” but “where is the actual heath, right here in this landscape?”

The collaboration isn’t precious. It can’t be. We’re working in spaces without heat, without proper lighting positions, where the fog rolls in whether you want atmosphere or not. So you’re solving problems: How do we keep the audience moving? How do we time this so they’re in the shelter during the storm monologue? What happens when someone has to piss, do we build that into the journey or just accept that someone’s going to miss something?

And we’re having the real conversations: What’s John learned about playing this role that matters? What does Ava need from the space? What do I see that they can’t see from inside the work? Where’s the image that makes all of this concrete, literally and metaphorically, for an audience that chose to show up on a cold day and walk through decommissioned military infrastructure to watch two people perform a play about dying?

Have more than thou showest,
Speak less than thou knowest,
Lend less than thou owest,
Ride more than thou goest,
Learn more than thou trowest,
Set less than thou throwest;

This Fool speech, that’s collaboration in a nutshell. Everybody’s holding something back, revealing something else. John’s got forty years of technique he’s not showing me. Ava’s making choices I won’t understand until I see them. I’m seeing compositions and moments they can’t see because they’re inside them. Three people with three different relationships to the same event, trying to make something that matters to strangers who’ll be cold and tired and wondering if they should have just stayed home.

The multiple locations thing. That’s the structural recognition that this text is about dissolution. About a kingdom fragmenting. About consciousness splitting apart.

And somewhere in all this, in the concrete that smells like rust and piss and history, in the wind that won’t stop just because we’re trying to perform, in the actual physical exhaustion of dragging an audience through abandoned military infrastructure, somewhere in there, we find the thing Shakespeare knew: that stripping away comfort doesn’t diminish us, it clarifies us. That necessity makes vile things precious. That the truth looks different when we’re cold and lost and the only light is whatever light we brought with us.

Building this thing with John and Ava means accepting that half our plans will get demolished by weather or logistics or the simple fact that concrete doesn’t care about our vision. It means adapting. It means the collaboration is partly with the space itself, which has its own history, its own meaning, its own demands. These space aren’t neutral. They’re saying something about American power, about obsolescence, about the things we build to protect ourselves from imaginary threats while the real threats, time, age, madness, death, walk right through the walls.

Rest of the pictures are ☞ here ☜

We Players King Fool

Rodeo Beach, Marin Headlands

Rodeo Beach, Marin Headlands, We Players, King Fool, Rodeo Beach Marin Headlands

Out of the rolling ocean the crowd came a drop gently to me,
Whispering, I love you, before long I die,
I have travell’d a long way merely to look on you to touch you,
For I could not die till I once look’d on you,
For I fear’d I might afterward lose you.
Now we have met, we have look’d, we are safe,
Return in peace to the ocean my love,
I too am part of that ocean, my love, we are not so much separated,
Behold the great rondure, the cohesion of all, how perfect!
But as for me, for you, the irresistible sea is to separate us,
As for an hour carrying us diverse, yet cannot carry us diverse forever;
Be not impatient – a little space – know you I salute the air, the ocean and the land,
Every day at sundown for your dear sake, my love.
Walt Whitman

Rodeo Beach Marin Headlands Sunset

Andres Amador beach art: Middle Finger to Permanence

Andres Amador is out there on some windswept strip of beach, dragging a rake through wet sand like some deranged Zen monk, creating beach art, massive geometric mandalas, that would make the ancients weep. Two hours of work. Maybe three if he’s feeling ambitious. Intricate, precise, beautiful beyond any reasonable measure of beauty.

And then… gone. The tide comes in and eats it whole.

This is a middle finger to permanence, to the museum culture vultures, to everyone who ever told you art needs to last to matter. Amador quit his tech job and committed himself to making things that cannot survive. Cannot be bought, cannot be sold, cannot be preserved in formaldehyde for future generations.

Andres Amador’s beach art is performance and sculpture and land art all at once, but also something else entirely: a statement about impermanence so loud it whispers. He’s not fighting the ocean. He’s collaborating with oblivion.

Creating beauty specifically for the void.

Rehearsing King Fool in a Graveyard

The cemetery was vanity transmogrified into stone. Instead of growing more sensible in death, the inhabitants of the cemetery were sillier than they had been in life.
Milan Kundera, The Unbearable Lightness of Being

Truth? About getting to the marrow of what Shakespeare actually meant? Then get your ass out of those antiseptic black box theaters with their climate control and their MFA-certified pretensions, and plant yourself among the dead.

Shakespeare wasn’t writing for posterity. He was writing for people who knew, really fucking knew, that they were meat on a clock. The plague wasn’t a metaphor. Death wasn’t a theatrical device. It was the guy I drank with last Thursday, now rotting in a pit.

We Players, Ava Roy, We Players graveyard, John Hadden, rehearsing in a graveyard, Mother Lear, theatre documentation, rehearsal photography, site integrated theatre

So when Ava’s stumbling through the Fool’s soliloquy with the actual bones of the departed six feet beneath your feet, when the wind cuts through John and makes his voice crack on “That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm” when a crow interrupts his big moment and we all realize nature gives exactly zero fucks about any interpretation of iambic pentameter, that’s when something real starts to happen.

The graveyard doesn’t let you hide. Can’t phone it in. Can’t rely on blocking and lights and the comfortable remove of artifice. You’re out there, exposed, ridiculous, shouting four-hundred-year-old poetry at the sky like some beautiful lunatic, and the dead are your audience, your witnesses, your reminder that all of this, the ambition, the jealousy, the love, the revenge, ends in the same dirt.

That’s not morbid. That’s honest. And we all deserves honesty.

We Players King Fool Rehearsal, part two

We Players Lear Rehearsal at Battery Wallace in the Marin Headlands

Doth any here know me? This is not Lear:
Doth Lear walk thus? speak thus? Where are his eyes?
Either his notion weakens, his discernings
Are lethargied–Ha! waking? ’tis not so.
Who is it that can tell me who I am?
Shakespeare, King Lear, 1.4

We Players, Ava Roy, John Hadden, King Lear, King Fool, Battery Wallace, marin headlands, san francisco, site integrated, site specific, theatre, theater, documentation, photography, jamie lyonsAva Roy, John Hadden, rehearsal, We Players, King Fool, Battery Wallace, Marin Headlands, site integrated theatre, photography, documentationAva Roy, John Hadden, rehearsal, We Players, King Fool, Battery Wallace, Marin Headlands, site integrated theatre, photography, documentation

When we are born, we cry that we are come
To this great stage of fools
Shakespeare, King Lear

We Players Lear rehearsal for King Fool

We Players Vessels for Improvisation

We Players Vessels for Improvisation at Hyde Street Pier with inkBoat  and Rova Saxophone Quartet.

ROVA saxophone quartet, inkBoat, We Players, Jamie Lyons, Shinichi Iova-Koga, Dana Iova-Koga, Dohee Lee, ava roy, lauren dietrich chavez

ROVA saxophone quartet, inkBoat, We Players, Jamie Lyons, Shinichi Iova-Koga, Dana Iova-Koga, Dohee Lee, ava roy, lauren dietrich chavez

We Players, Rova Saxophone Quartet, InkBoat, Vessels, improvisation, Shinichi Iova Koga, Larry Ochs, site specific dance, performance, bay area

In the long history of humankind (and animal kind, too) those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed.
Charles Darwin

Rehearsing Happy Days in a Los Feliz Sweatbox: A Play Nobody Will See

I know this thing is doomed. Katie knows it too, though we don’t say it out loud during our afternoon rehearsals in that sweatbox of a studio space in Los Feliz.  Michael doesn’t know, which is somehow worse. Or maybe he does.

The heat in LA is biblical, relentless. Beckett. Happy Days. A woman buried up to her waist, then her neck, talking to fill the void while the world ends around her. Seems about right.

Katie’s good, though. Really good. She understands that Winnie isn’t just absurd, she’s all of us, performing cheerfulness while buried alive in our own particular pile of shit. Michael reads Willie, that half-dead husband crawling around in the background. We run the lines. We explore the pauses, those Beckettian silences that mean everything and nothing.

Will this ever see an audience? No. Will it get funding? Absolutely not. Will Katie and Michael and I still be doing this next month, even next week? Doubtful.

Regardless, rehearsing plays nobody’s going to see… you learn.

The way Katie finds a moment in the text, or maybe I discover something human in Willie’s grunts and crawls… that might be the thing I need next year, in some other production that might actually happen.

You show up. You do the work. Because the alternative is staying home, and that’s just Krapp.

Samuel Beckett, Happy Days, Collected Works, Katie Sigismund, theatre, rehearsal Samuel Beckett, Happy Days, Collected Works, Katie Sigismund, theatre, rehearsal Samuel Beckett, Happy Days, Collected Works, Katie Sigismund, theatre, rehearsal

No better, no worse, no change No pain.

Katie Sigismund as Winnie in Samuel Beckett’s Happy Days

 

Harold Pinter Locked in a Room in Hell, Or: How the BBC Accidentally Made Existentialism Punch You in the Face

So there’s this thing from 1964 floating around YouTube, Philip Saville’s production of Jean Paul Sartre‘s No Exit  (Huis Clos) for the BBC, retitled In Camera because apparently the British needed something that sounded more like a parking violation than eternal damnation.

Harold Pinter is in it. Not writing it, acting in it. Playing Garcin, this dead coward journalist stuck in a room with two women he can neither fuck nor escape, which is basically Sartre’s entire philosophical project condensed into 90 minutes of claustrophobic studio drama.

Here’s what you need to understand: Philip Saville had two days in the studio. TWO DAYS. And ten days of rehearsal. That’s it. And what does this maniac do? He builds FIVE versions of the same hellish room, each with different walls and ceilings removed so his cameras can get in there like surgical instruments, dissecting these three doomed souls from every conceivable angle. There are shots from below. Shots from directly overhead. There’s this one pan that follows Estelle (Catherine Woodville) as she runs in a circle that makes you feel like you’re trapped in an M.C. Escher nightmare.

The set is minimalist perfection, three benches, three pieces of contemporary art (maybe a Pauline Boty on the wall?), one sculpture after Reg Butler, a paperknife that nobody can use for anything, and a locked door. That’s it. That’s Hell. No fire, no brimstone, just you and two other people and infinite time to contemplate what wretched creatures you all are.

Jane Arden, Saville’s wife at the time, plays Inez, the one who actually gets what’s happening before anyone else. She’s the lesbian who seduced her cousin’s wife and feels approximately zero guilt about it. Pinter delivers “L’enfer, c’est les autres”, “Hell is other people”, with that particular brand of menace he’d later perfect in his own plays, where every pause is a threat and every word is a weapon.

And yes, maybe it’s a bit overwrought. Maybe the philosophical pontification feels a little ridiculous now that we’re fifty years downstream from French existentialism’s peak cultural moment. The Sunday Times critic at the time certainly thought so, sniffing that nothing interesting ever quite happened. But John Russell Taylor got it right when he called Saville “the nearest thing we have, or probably are likely to get, to an Orson Welles of the small screen.”

Because what Saville understood, what Pinter understood playing Garcin, is that Hell isn’t metaphysical. It’s other people’s eyes on you, their judgments, their needs, their inescapable presence. It’s being seen and known and unable to perform your way out of it. It’s being trapped in a room with your own bullshit and two other people who won’t let you get away with it.

The BBC stuck this thing into The Wednesday Play, which was supposed to be about contemporary social drama, not French existentialist theatre. But maybe that’s exactly right. Because what’s more contemporary than being stuck in a room you can’t leave with people you can’t stand, forced to confront the fact that you’re not who you pretended to be?

Two days in the studio. Five versions of Hell. And Harold Pinter staring down the camera with the weight of his character’s cowardice crushing him like a slow-motion avalanche.

×