Skip to main content

Heterogeneous Spectacles

Janet Cardiff’s Forty Part Motet: A Dispatch from the Void Between Here and Never

Janet Cardiff, The Forty Part Motet, Fort Mason Center for Arts and Culture, Performance Photography, SFMOMA, SFMOMA Performance Art, practice and theory

The academics want you to believe that live performance (the sweating, breathing, bleeding out loud presence of actual human bodies in actual space) carries some sacred charge that recordings can’t touch. That there’s magic in the ephemeral, nobility in the disappearing act. Every moment unique, finite, gone the second it happens. Like watching your best years evaporate in a rearview mirror while listening to Nirvana at 3 a.m., realizing you can never get back to that first perfect hit of sound.

Film, video, any canned media: they’re supposed to be the death masks we make to trick ourselves into thinking we’ve captured something. Preservation through embalming. But here’s the thing nobody wants to admit: the corpse isn’t the person. The photograph shows you that someone was there, past tense, gone, a ghost trapped in chemicals and light. Roland Barthes, that magnificent depressive, called it an “illogical connection” between here and then. The photograph has no future tense, no forward momentum. It’s a tombstone leaning backards that thinks it’s a window.

Cinema cheats differently. Because it moves, because it lies with such gorgeous, shameless confidence, I don’t experience it as “has been” but as “there it is”: immediate, narcotic, a mainline shot of manufactured now.

All of this rests on a quiet assumption, the kind of theoretical bullshit that sounds profound until I actually stand in a room where it falls apart: that media objects sit on one side of time (the past), and living bodies sit on the other (the present), and the drama is about whether one can ever truly bridge the gap. As if time were a river you could stand on opposite banks of, waving sadly across the current.

Then Janet Cardiff walks into the room and kicks over the whole theoretical bar. Smashes the bottles. Sets fire to the lecture notes.

The Forty Part Motet shouldn’t work according to any of these tidy categories, these neat little taxonomies the theorists build so they can sleep at night. Forty speakers arranged in an oval like some sonic Stonehenge, each one broadcasting a single voice from the Salisbury Cathedral Choir singing Thomas Tallis’s 16th century Spem in Alium. Fourteen minutes on loop: eleven minutes of ecstatic polyphony that’ll pin you to the floor, three minutes of silence to let your nervous system come down off whatever just happened to it. Everything recorded. Nothing live. Dead on arrival, by the old rules.

But the work does not stage the recording as a relic of a vanished performance, some museum piece under glass. It builds an architecture that requires a living body to turn that recording into an event. I’m not the audience. I’m the missing component. The engine won’t turn over without me.

I (I in this case, specifically, but could be you, your dumb beautiful self wandering through space) become the only moving part in the system. The only unstable variable. Bodies drift through the oval like lost pilgrims at a rave they don’t remember arriving at, faces shifting between rapture and confusion, leaning close to one speaker then peeling away, chasing a soprano line, abandoning it for a bass that’s doing something impossible three speakers over, trying to hold all forty voices in their head at once and failing beautifully, gloriously, the way we all fail at holding onto anything worth holding onto. My path through space becomes a mixing board. My position is a filter. My movement is a form of composition. I’m remixing the sixteenth century with my fucking feet.

This isn’t “interactivity” in the cheap, button press sense, the democratized garbage they sell you at science museums. I am not adding to the work. I am what synchronizes it. Without me, it’s just speakers playing to an empty room, which is either Zen perfection or complete meaninglessness depending on how stoned you are.

16th century composition.
21st century recording.
Architectural space.
Present tense perception.

These temporal layers do not line up on their own. My body is the processor that forces them into relation. I’m the bridge, except I’m also walking across myself, which sounds like a Zen koan but is actually just what it feels like to be alive and paying attention.

I’m present in the now, but I’m listening to a moment that happened somewhere else, sometime before. Past and present grinding against each other like tectonic plates, neither one winning, both real, both impossible, both here. But what Cardiff exposes (what she rips open and shows us the guts of) is that this friction isn’t a problem to be solved; it’s the engine of the work. The recording is not a dead past waiting to be contemplated with appropriate solemnity. It’s a temporal charge waiting for my exquisite 6’5″ 45 year old body to complete the circuit. I’m the lightning rod for ghosts singing in Latin.

This is where Barthes’ distinction starts to wobble, then collapses entirely, then gets back up and staggers around the room looking for its shoes. The recording does not sit there as pure “has-been,” some monument to absence. It plays at being immediate: I know it’s a lie, an aesthetic con job, but I play along anyway because what else am I going to do, leave? And in playing along, in moving, in choosing which voice to chase like I’m picking which memory to fall into at 4 a.m., I re-temporalize the sound. The past does not simply appear in the present; it is re-engineered through my embodied traversal of space. I’m a time machine made of flesh and bad decisions.

The pre recorded sound is both residue and construction material. Not resurrection. Not preservation. Recomposition. The difference matters, the way the difference between embalming and surgery matters, the way the difference between a photograph and a wound matters.

What hits hardest (what leaves me standing there after the last voice fades, watching strangers’ faces as they leave the oval, everybody looking slightly stunned like they just woke up from a dream they can’t quite remember) is not awe at technological illusion, and not nostalgia for the “original” choir session that happened in some cathedral I’ll never visit. It’s the dawning recognition that the work was never complete without me. That I wasn’t optional. The document doesn’t just mark what happened; it creates the conditions under which something else can happen. Documentation here is not storage. It’s an activation structure. It’s a loaded gun that needs my finger on the trigger.

The plenitude of the past doesn’t stay dead, but it doesn’t come back whole either. It’s broken apart, spatialized, redistributed across speakers, across frequencies, across the paths of wandering listeners who think they’re just looking at art but are actually making it without realizing it. Meaning, presence, and “now” emerge from this choreography between fixed recording and moving bodies. The event is not in the file. It’s in the encounter. It’s in me, right now, standing between speaker twelve and speaker seventeen, trying to figure out if that’s a tenor or an alto and why it matters so much that I’m almost crying.

Cardiff’s piece quietly detonates the old opposition between live and recorded by showing that both are incomplete categories, that the whole argument was a setup from the beginning. Liveness is not a property of bodies. Recording is not a property of media. What matters is the system that brings bodies, sounds, and space into dynamic relation. Here, the listener is not a witness to an artwork. They are the temporal mechanism that allows it to occur. They are the gear that turns the other gears. They are necessary.

The best kind of haunting isn’t the one where the past returns unchanged, pristine, perfectly preserved in formaldehyde. It’s the one where ghosts and the living have to build something together, in real time, from whatever fragments they can hold in common. Where neither side gets what they want, but both get something better: a moment that couldn’t have existed in either time zone alone. A moment that requires both the dead and the living to collaborate, to compromise, to make something new out of the wreckage of what was.

That’s what I’m doing in that oval. Building a cathedral out of air and old tape and my own dumb beautiful presence. And when I leave, it collapses again, waiting for the next body to walk through and make it real.

James Freebury’s first look at Book 6 of The Odyssey

Book 6. Nausicaa. The one where Odysseus washes up like human driftwood, salt-caked and wrecked and basically naked, and has to beg a princess for help without seeming like either a pervert or a pathetic case. It’s about being broken and trying to hold onto some shred of dignity while you’re covered in seaweed and your own exhaustion.

Homer, Odyssey, Jamie Freebury, Sutro Baths, Sutro heights, san francisco theatre, theater bay area, site specific performance, classical performanceHomer, Odyssey, Jamie Freebury, Sutro Baths, Sutro heights, san francisco theatre, theater bay area, site specific performance, classical performanceHomer, Odyssey, Jamie Freebury, Sutro Baths, Sutro heights, san francisco theatre, theater bay area, site specific performance, classical performance

And Jamie Freebury’s out there in those concrete pools that used to be Sutro’s wet dream of democratic bathing, those ruins that the ocean’s been patiently reclaiming since 1966, performing this story about shipwreck and survival and the distance between where you thought you’d be and where you actually ended up. The Pacific’s right there doing what it’s always done, which is exactly nothing and absolutely everything simultaneously, and somewhere in that space between the ancient Greek understanding that the universe wants to destroy you and the decidedly American ruins of a robber baron’s vision of leisure, something’s happening that probably shouldn’t work but absolutely does.

Because here’s the thing about performing 2,800 year old poetry in a place that’s actively falling apart: it’s either the most pretentious bullshit imaginable or it’s an honest attempt to get at something. There’s no middle ground. And standing there with the fog rolling in and the ruins refusing to be metaphorical because they’re too busy being literal ruins, you realize Homer knew all along that this is what happens, civilizations build their bathhouses and their certainties and the sea just waits.

Jamie Freebury’s performance of Book 6 of Homer’s Odyssey
Sutro Baths & Sutro Heights

Sophocles Speechless Fish

Speechless Fish, I call it. Informally. Because sometimes the informal is all you’ve got when you’re dealing with theatrical ghosts that ancient, scraps of text that survived fires, floods, the general amnesia of civilization. This is part of something bigger, something I’m calling IOTA, which sounds either pretentious as hell or like the most honest thing I’ve ever attempted, depending on your tolerance for resurrecting dead Greek dramatists. Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides,the holy trinity of tragedy, most of whose work is just… gone. Vanished. And here I am, trying to breathe some kind of temporary life into what’s left.

The fish were dead. Obviously. Eight of them lined up on that fence like a jury that had already reached its verdict. They weren’t props, they were collaborators. Silent witnesses. The Greek chorus that couldn’t sing. And maybe that’s the point. Maybe Sophocles, wherever he is in the cosmic void, gets a kick out of dead fish speaking his words through their very inability to speak. The irony is so thick you could choke on it.

Two and a half minutes. That’s all it took. That’s all it takes, really, to say something true about the human condition if you’re not padding it with bullshit. The ancient Greeks understood economy, they knew that sometimes the fragment is more powerful than the whole, that incompleteness can devastate you in ways that resolution never could.

And the audience? Three people. Three. One of them was… well, someone who had to be there. But the other two? Hell’s Angels. I’m not making this up. Two actual Hell’s Angels showed up to watch a performance of a lost Sophocles fragment involving dead fish on a fence in San Gregorio on a partly cloudy afternoon three days before Christmas.

You can’t plan for that kind of perfection. You can’t manufacture that collision of high culture and American outsider mythology. It just happens, or it doesn’t. This time, it did. And for two and a half minutes, under that indecisive sky, something ancient and something immediate existed in the same space, and nobody knew quite what to do with it except let it be what it was: strange, fleeting, and probably unrepeatable.

Speechless Fish, Site Specific Art, Environmental Art, Art Research, Fish Art, Ephemeral performance silence, San Gregorio California history, Dead fish theatrical collaborators

The Fragment…
A chorus of speechless fish made a din
saluting their dear mistress
with their tails

 

The Location…
So Father Juan Crespi shows up on Tuesday, October 24, 1769, dragging his Franciscan ass through the coastal brush, and he’s got his diary out, scribbling notes like he’s some kind of eighteenth-century Yelp reviewer with a crucifix. “Fine place,” he writes. Good lands. Abundance of water. Translation: this would make an excellent mission, meaning an excellent place to fundamentally alter the trajectory of Indigenous existence. He names it San Pedro Regalado, after some patron saint nobody outside the Catholic hierarchy remembers, because that’s what you do when you’re convinced God sent you to California to plant flags in other people’s soil.The blackberries are so thick they can’t walk. Seven hours of travel gets them two leagues, which tells you everything about the terrain and probably the condition of their feet. They arrive at a “camping place”, Crespi’s words, not mine, where there’s a village of what he calls “heathen,” because apparently not being Christian in 1769 means you don’t get a better noun. These people receive the Spanish with “much friendliness,” which is either genuinely hospitable or the greatest example of not-yet-knowing-what’s-coming in California history. Fair-skinned, well-formed, some bearded. Living near the beach, about half a league from where the missionaries set up camp, with seasonal houses in the valley. They’ve got an arroyo running through the middle, plenty of water heading to the ocean, and the only problem Crespi can identify is the scarcity of wood. But hey, mountains nearby, redwood brush everywhere. Problem solved.
Fast forward through the Mexican era: the place becomes Rancho San Gregorio, named after Pope Gregory I, because why stop with one layer of Catholic nomenclature when you can pile on another?

By the 1850s, San Gregorio’s transformed into a resort town for wealthy San Franciscans who apparently had nothing better to do than take bone-rattling stagecoach rides to something called San Gregorio House for fishing, hunting, sea bathing, boat races, the full menu of Victorian leisure activities for people with disposable income and time to kill.

That building’s still standing. So is The General Store, operating since 1889, which means it’s been selling… whatever people needed… for over a century. Witness to everything.
What Crespi didn’t write about, what never makes it into the missionary diaries or the resort brochures, is the Chinese community that lived along the creek in the nineteenth century until heavy rains washed their buildings into oblivion. Erased. Just gone. As if they were never there.

By 1915, the community’s running seven cheese factories. Seven. From missionary outpost to resort destination to dairy hub in a hundred and fifty years. That’s the American trajectory in miniature: repurpose, reinvent, forget what came before, move on.

Gerald Casel Spinters in Our Ankles

This isn’t some gauzy statement about the fragility of memory. It’s literal: the Tinikling, that Filipino folk dance where you hop between bamboo poles that snap together like jaws, came out of Spanish colonial rice field punishments. People got their ankles crushed. And here’s Gerald Casel, generations later, making something beautiful out of inherited trauma while you’re there with my Leica trying to capture presence.

Gerald Casel, ODC, Splinters, san francisco dance, san francisco performance, dance photography, dance documentation, jamie lyons, san francisco art, Gerald Casel ODC, Gerald Casel choreography

I’m not documenting. Let’s be honest about that. I’m doing something more like archaeology and theft simultaneously. Every frame’s a decision about what dies and what gets embalmed. Do I catch Kristen Bell mid leap when her face is all effort and sweat slick concentration, or do you wait for that microsecond of transcendence that’s so perfect it’s almost a lie? Because bodies in motion are truth tellers: they can’t fake the way muscles engage or breath catches, but my shutter’s always editorializing, always choosing the moment that’ll play over the moment that was.

And ODC, man: that space has seen decades of bodies trying to say things language can’t touch. The wood’s probably saturated with rosin and ambition. I’m in there with my finger on the trigger, half in darkness, trying not to be that guy whose shutter click punctures the performance, but also knowing I have to puncture it because that’s my whole contradictory gig. I’m the designated rememberer in a medium that’s fundamentally about forgetting, about the unrepeatable now.

The perverse beauty is that Gerald’s already wrestling with colonialism, with cultural amnesia, with the violence encoded in “folk tradition,” and I’m adding another layer of abstraction to it. My photographs will outlive everyone’s memory of the actual performance. They’ll become the performance in 10, 20, 50 years. Some kid will Google “Splinters in Our Ankles” and my image is what they’ll see, not the heat or the sound of feet or Tim Russell’s score vibrating through ribcages.

That’s either incredibly arrogant or incredibly humble, depending on whether you’re awake to the responsibility. I’m not just making pretty pictures of athletic bodies doing interesting shapes, though yeah, there’s that too, and let’s not pretend the aesthetics don’t seduce us. I’m creating evidence that this particular configuration of humans said something that mattered, in a form that vanishes by design, and your testimony is all that’ll remain.

Splinters in Our Ankles

Gerald Casel’s Splinters in Our Ankles is a contemporary movement essay that responds to the colonial origins and collective cultural amnesia imbued in the Philippine folk dance, Tinikling.  Choreographed and directed by Gerald Casel, this evening-length premiere is created in collaboration with dancers Arletta Anderson, Kristen Bell, Christina Briggs-Winslow, Rebecca Chaleff, Janet Collard, Peiling Kao, Kevin Lopez, and Parker Murphy, with original music composed and performed by Tim Russell and lighting and media design by Jack Beuttler.

2 + 2 = 22: Man Ray’s Hollywood Equations

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

King Lear

Here’s the thing about Man Ray sitting in Hollywood in 1948, chain-smoking and staring at photographs he took a decade earlier of nineteenth-century plaster shapes that some French mathematician built to explain shit that nobody except twelve people in the world could actually understand, it’s the most beautiful kind of fuck-you to meaning itself.

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, canvas painting, Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing

Think about it. The guy’s in exile. All of Europe’s best minds are washing up on the California shore like interesting debris, drinking too much at parties with Stravinsky and Buñuel, pretending they’re not drowning in ennui while the orange trees bloom and the studio system grinds out its dreams. And Man Ray looks at these photographs, these mathematical models, curves and surfaces and impossible geometries that exist purely to make the invisible visible, to give form to abstraction, and he says, essentially…

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, art work, Hamlet

Hamlet

“Yeah, these are like Hamlet.”

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, Oil Painting, Macbeth

Macbeth

Not because they are. That’s the whole goddamn point. He writes “2 + 2 = 22” on a blackboard behind one of them like some kind of Zen koan cooked up by a hungover dadaist. He plays games getting people to match the paintings to the plays and doesn’t give a shit when they get it wrong, sometimes they got it right; sometimes of course, they didn’t, and it was just as well!

Because what he’s really painting, what he’s been painting since he put a camera down and picked up a brush again, is the space between things. The gap where meaning should be but isn’t. Where mathematics dead-ends into beauty. Where Shakespeare’s human equations of jealousy and murder and love become these white plaster things, these mute witnesses to their own incomprehensibility.

Oil Painting, Merchant of Venice, Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

Merchant of Venice

And André Breton warned Man Ray not to show the paintings next to the actual mathematical models, said the art would get “definitely outclassed.” He was right, of course. You can’t beat mathematics for stark beauty. But that wasn’t the point either. The point was the translation itself, the impossible journey from equation to photograph to painting to Twelfth Night, each step further from any source you could pin down, each transformation more gorgeously, willfully absurd.

Oil Painting, Twelfth Night, Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

Twelfth Night

Man Ray took objects designed for pure reason and turned them into headless torsos, into skulls that look like breasts, into theatrical tableaux where the only drama is the refusal of sense. He made beauty out of estrangement. In Hollywood. During wartime. While Europe burned.

Oil painting, William Shakespeare, As You Like It

As You Like It

His tombstone says “unconcerned, but not indifferent,” and yes, that’s it exactly. That’s the whole Shakespeare Equations hustle in five words. Not indifferent to beauty, to form, to the ecstatic collision of incompatible things. But utterly unconcerned with whether any of it adds up.

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, oil painting, Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar

Taxidermist or The Last Ones There Get to Say What It Meant

What the Fuck Are We Even Doing Here?

Performance photography and critical writing: we’re both chasing the same fucking unicorn. Trying to tell you what went down in that room when the air got thick, when something cracked open and spilled out onto the floor, when you could feel it in your teeth.

Except we’re lying. Not maliciously, maybe, but we’re lying.

Alexey Brodovitch Ballet

We’re not capturing shit. We’re taxidermists. We show up after the animal’s already dead and stuff it into a pose that looks alive if you squint. We hand you the mounted head and say, “See? This is what it was.” A postcard from a place we never actually visited.

And here’s the thing that makes my teeth itch: that fake gets taken seriously.

Performance evaporates. Our stuff sticks around. It gets filed, referenced, quoted, taught. It outlives the sweaty bodies that actually did the thing. Which means the people writing the history are the ones who weren’t there when history got made.

That’s not a bug. That’s the whole fucking system.

Alexey Brodovitch Ballet

Critics and photographers work from a position of beautiful, cowardly safety. We get to choose what mattered after the bodies have left the building. We edit. We frame. We explain. We take the bloody, chaotic mess and sand it down into something that makes sense, then call ourselves insightful for doing it. We’re the cover band claiming we understand the original better than the original understood itself.

Meanwhile, performers are out there working without a net. A moment lands or it eats shit. A bad night doesn’t get recontextualized into “part of the process.” It’s just a bad fucking night, and everybody saw it. They don’t get to workshop their failure in the editing room. They live it, in real time, in front of witnesses.

That’s the fundamental imbalance that powers this entire hustle.

Alexey Brodovitch Ballet

Directors (the real ones, anyway) are trying to jam a crowbar between the text and the flesh. They’re not decorating the script; they’re forcing words through throats that resist them, watching what happens when language gets shoved into bodies it wasn’t designed for. They want discomfort. They want you to hear the violence in making meaning.

But they’re trapped. The text is always already in there, metastasized through everything. I’ve tried  to isolate the playwright’s intention from my own neuroses, and it’s like trying to unfuck a situation that was fucked from conception. Interpretation isn’t optional. It’s structural.

Critics pretend we’re above this. We construct our arguments like we’re building cathedrals. We’re precise. We situate. We contextualize everything into neat little boxes labeled by decade and movement and ideology. We turn explosions into case studies. We’re archivists pretending to be witnesses.

Sometimes that’s useful. Sometimes it’s just academic cowardice.

Alexey Brodovitch Ballet

Context can be a weapon you use to avoid actually seeing anything. To skip past this specific body, this specific night, this specific way something broke open or broke down. You can classify something to death without ever letting it touch you. When context arrives too fast, it doesn’t illuminate. It embalms.

Photography makes me angrier because it’s more honest about its betrayal.

A performance photograph is from somewhere. It can’t hide behind abstraction. It’s this body, this light, this fraction of a second that will never repeat. In that sense it’s closer to performance than criticism: it admits its specificity. But it inherits all of criticism’s privilege: the power to choose, to control, to survive.
One frame replaces ninety minutes. One image becomes the official record. The photograph circulates while the performance rots, and eventually the image is what happened. Not evidence. Verdict.

And like criticism, photography gets to play the numbers game. You shoot three hundred frames, publish twelve, and let the archive protect you. Weak work dissolves into “the body of work.” Meaning emerges through accumulation instead of precision. I never have to fully answer for one image because it’s always part of something bigger.

Performers don’t get that kind of shelter.

This is why what we do feels parasitic even when it’s done well. Not because it feeds on performance (that’s expected) but because it feeds on performance’s erasure. We pick the bones of something that can’t talk back. We freeze something that defined itself through motion.

That’s what makes me want to put my fist through a wall.

Alexey Brodovitch Ballet

Not that performance photography and criticism exist, but that they’re granted authority without having earned it through risk. That distance gets converted into expertise. That the thing that survives gets confused with the thing that was true.

Everywhere something raw happens, someone shows up later with a notebook and a theory. Theater. Streets. Riots. Revolutions. The bodies do the work. The scribes arrive afterward with the official story. And too often, the last ones there get to say what it all meant.

So what the fuck are we doing here?

If we’re being honest? We’re not preserving performance. We’re colonizing it. We’re deciding which fragments get to represent a night that can’t defend itself anymore because it’s already gone.

Maybe someday there’ll be a tradition of performance photography that knows what it owes. That understands its own violence. That stops pretending preservation and predation are different things.

But not yet.

Not yet.

The Clean Loneliness

What is that feeling when you’re driving away from people and they recede on the plain till you see their specks dispersing? – it’s the too-huge world vaulting us, and it’s good-bye. But we lean forward to the next crazy venture beneath the skies.
Jack Kerouac, On the Road

The thing about Thanksgiving is that everyone has somewhere to be. And that, if you play it right, makes it the perfect day to be absolutely fucking nowhere.

San Diego. Her family’s place. Turkey and stuffing and all those warm, promises of belonging. She’d asked me three weeks ago, casual. “So, Thanksgiving. I’m going down to my fathers’. In San Diego. You could… I mean, if you want to come, you’re welcome.”

You’re welcome. Not “I want you there.” Not “come with me.” You’re welcome. Like I’m a coworker who might not have plans. Like she’s checking a box.

The timing’s shit, is the thing. We’ve been dating, three months? Four? Long enough that ignoring Thanksgiving would’ve been weird. Not long enough that Thanksgiving together was obvious. We hit that threshold right as the holidays started bearing down, and suddenly we’re both doing this awkward dance of “what are we” meets “what do we do about Thursday.”

Maybe she wanted me there. Maybe she was just doing what you do when you’re in that murky territory between casual and something else, and the calendar forces your hand. Maybe her dad asked if she was seeing anyone, and she said yes, and her dad said well bring him, and now here we are, both wondering if this is too much too soon but neither of us willing to say it.

Which is exactly why I’m here, alone, on a thirty-two-foot sloop in the middle of the goddamn Bay.

The city’s empty. Everyone’s inside, fulfilling obligations and calling them traditions. The bridge hangs there in the distance, rust-red against the grey, as uncommitted as I am. The water’s cold. The wind’s picking up. And I am, for better or worse, choosing honest solitude over polite uncertainty.

Because what’s worse than being alone on Thanksgiving? Being at someone’s family table, wondering if you’re supposed to be there. Making small talk with her dad while you both wonder if you’ll even know each other’s names in six months. Smiling for the brother.  Playing house before you know if there’s a house to play in.

Thanksgiving sailing adventure, Relationship uncertainty, Choosing solitude over company, San Francisco Bay, Honest loneliness vs complicated warmth

The sails snap and fill. The boat heels. And I’m doing what I always do, choosing the clean loneliness over the complicated warmth.

She texted this morning. Early. “Have a great day.” Not “wish you were here.” Not “you’re missing out.” Just… have a great day. Like she gets it. Or like she’s relieved. Hard to tell the difference when you’re both being so fucking polite about everything.

Maybe she’s sitting at that table right now, perfectly happy I’m not there. One less thing to explain. One less person to worry about. No awkward introductions to a guy who might not stick around. Or maybe she’s hurt. Maybe she’s wondering what kind of asshole picks a boat and a dog over her family, over her. Maybe this is the moment she decides I’m not worth the trouble.

The sun’s getting lower. The wind’s getting colder. And somewhere in San Diego, there’s a woman who deserves someone who doesn’t overthink everything. Who just shows up. Who doesn’t turn a simple holiday invitation into an existential crisis on a sailboat.

But she’s also the woman who said “you’re welcome” instead of “please come,” and maybe that means she gets it too. Maybe we’re both not quite ready. Maybe the timing really is just shit, and we’re both out here, her at her father’s table, me on this boat, doing the best we can with a situation neither of us knows how to navigate.

I point the bow toward the Berkeley marina. The day’s almost over. The holiday’s almost done.

Tonight we’ll talk, we talk every night..

One more day alone. Then we’ll see.

J’aime bien les couchers de soleil

WANDERLUST: Bolinas sunset…

This raggedy edge of the continent, where the Mesa drops into the Pacific like God’s own ashtray has  the kind of beautiful decay that makes you understand why people become insufferable about places.

Bolinas, sunset

The light here doesn’t apologize. It just bleeds out across tide pools and driftwood and the barnacled pier pilings, turning everything into some prehistoric theater where the main act is entropy and salt air. You can taste the mildew in the fog, smell decades of patchouli and pot smoke baked into the weathered redwood siding. There’s desperation in paradise, always has been, artists and outlaws and burned out seekers who found the edge and decided stopping was better than the long fall.

It’s hostile and gorgeous and completely indifferent to my journey of self discovery. Which is exactly what makes it sacred. The sunset doesn’t give a shit about my camera or my revelations. It just happens, spectacular and brutal, while the ocean keeps erasing everything I thought mattered.

 
J’aime bien les couchers de soleil. Allons voir un coucher de soleil…
I am very fond of sunsets. Come, let us go look at a sunset…
Antoine de Saint Exupéry, Le Petit Prince (1943)

Dusk Detonations: Reclaiming the Amphitheatre from Dead White Metaphors

‘Change life! ‘Change society!’
These precepts mean nothing without the production of an appropriate space.
Henri Lefebvre

So here’s the thing about fairy tales performed at dusk in an amphitheater: someone decided that the only way to properly fuck with Grimm and Perrault was to drag their corpses outside, shake the dust off those cautionary misogynist parables, and let women rewrite the whole goddamn script under an open sky while the light dies. That’s punk rock in its purest form, not the safety pins and spit, but the absolute refusal to let the story stay where someone else put it.

fox mirror forest, Frost Ampitheater, Stanford, theater, performance studies, frost amphitheater, theatre, performance, documentation, photography, jamie lyons, site specific, outside, costume, design, palywright, original, dance, choreography

Lefebvre’s quote sits there like a dare. “Change society” sounds like something scrawled on a dorm room wall after too much coffee and Camus, but pair it with space, actual, physical, claim this ground space, and suddenly you’re talking about something that matters. An amphitheater is a wound in the landscape, a deliberate carving that says “gather here, witness this.” Using it for reimagined fairy tales is like using a cathedral to sell bootleg cassettes. It’s profane. It’s necessary.

The fox, the mirror, the forest, these aren’t symbols, they’re accomplices. Trickster, reflection, labyrinth. Put them together and you get something feral and honest, the kind of honesty that only exists when you strip away the walls and the fourth wall and let the whole performance breathe the same air as the audience. Theater like this doesn’t ask for suspension of disbelief; it demands that you acknowledge exactly where you are, what you’re complicit in by showing up.

And the women writing it, directing it, they’re not fixing fairy tales, they’re detonating them. That’s the real revolution: not the space itself, but who gets to decide what happens there when the sun goes down.

fox mirror forest

A devised site-specific play
inspired by Rosemary Minard’s 1975 collection
Womenfolk and Fairy Tales
performed at dusk in Stanford’s Frost Amphitheater
Directed by Rebecca Chaleff and Rebecca Ormiston
Written by Rebecca Ormiston

Leica, Iron, and Invisible Rain: Eiffel Tower the Day Before Chernobyl, April 1986

Étant la plus saisissante manifestation de l’art des constructions métalliques par lesquelles nos ingénieurs se sont illustrés en Europe, elle est une des formes les plus frappantes de notre génie national moderne.
Gustave Eiffel

Here I am with this gorgeous Leica M2 I scored at some outdoor market in Marseille, and I’m pointing it at the most photographed hunk of iron in human history, thinking I’m capturing something, anything, that matters. In fact, I’m pretty sure this is the only photo that came out on that role of film.

And I was. Just not what I thought.

Because twenty-four hours later, we’re hearing about Chernobyl, and suddenly that rain we were dancing in, that atmospheric bullshit I was breathing while framing my shot, might be laced with cesium-137 and all the other greatest hits from the Soviet nuclear playlist. The tower’s still standing there, immortal and indifferent, while invisible particles are doing their slow-motion Nagasaki routine on my DNA.

Paris, France, Eiffel tower, Gustave Eiffel, Chernobyl radioactive rain Europe,
That’s the thing about cameras, about freezing moments: they lie by telling the truth. That frame says “April 1986, Paris, beauty, permanence, look at this marvelous structure.” It doesn’t say “the world is ending 1,500 miles east and I don’t know it yet.” Doesn’t say “I’m all contaminated and laughing about it.”

The Eiffel Tower’s been there since 1889, survived two world wars, outlasted everyone who built it. My Leica caught it on film while invisible poison drifted west. Both machines, doing what they do: bearing witness, preserving evidence, marking time.

And here I am, decades later, still here. Those rain clouds hopefully came from Norway or Sweden rather than the Ukraine. The tower, the photo, me, survivors of everything that tried to kill us, most notably our own beautiful, reckless ignorance.

×