Walking affirms, suspects, tries out, transgresses, respects, etc., the trajectories it “speaks”. All the modalities sing a part in the chorus, changing from step to step, stepping in through proportions, sequences, and intensities which vary according to the time, the path taken and the walker. These enunciatory operations are of an unlimited diversity. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life
“You’re afraid of the audience, aren’t you?” “Yes, but it’s not stagefright. It’s that I’m there as the geek. They like to watch me eat my shit. But it pays the light bill and takes me to the racetrack. I don’t have any excuses about why I do it.” Charles Bukowski, Women
This feeling of power, it’s happiness to sit in a cottage by the Danube among six women who think I’m semi-idiot, and to know that in Paris, the headquarters of intelligence, 500 people are sitting dead-quiet in the auditorium and are foolish enough to expose their brains to my powers of suggestion. Some revolt! But many will go away with my spores in their gray matter. They will go home pregnant with the seed of my soul, and they will breed my brood. August Strindberg, letter of July 14, 1894
Who but the artist has the power to open man up, to set free the imagination? The others – priest, teacher, saint, statesman, warrior – hold us to the path of history. They keep us chained to the rock, that the vultures may eat out our hearts. It is the artist who has the courage to go against the crowd; he is the unrecognized “hero of our time” – and of all time. Henry Miller, Stand Still Like the Hummingbird
A true priest is aware of the presence of the altar during every moment that he is conducting a service. It is exactly the same way that a true artist should react to the stage all the time he is in the theater. An actor who is incapable of this feeling will never be a true artist. Konstantin Stanislavisky
Last week
i spent some time with this gentleman outside the Old Mint
He’s a jazz musician
played with some of the greats up and down California
taught at Foothill and De Anza college
the bottom fell out for him in 2008
he sold his horn in 2011
but he’s not stopping
he’s always teaching
he’s putting a band together
he feels the turn coming
looking at the performativity of ordinary behavior I address phenomena inextricably interwoven into my empirical experience my internal mediation of that experiencethis sense of performance is radically different from those events in which I as a theatre artists establish an imaginary world that in Wolfgang Iser’s terms is bracketed off from ordinary experience.aIser positions fiction by claiming that narrative is not mimetic, not a representation of empirical reality but that narrative puts forward the details of an imaginary that we conceptualize in the processes of reading. That imaginary world allows us to conceptualize what is, in the world of empirical reality, inaccessible. We challenge the empirical through putting the imaginary up against the empirical. The separation between the imaginary and the empirical allows us to juxtapose the two and, through that juxtaposition, witness their interaction.performance art addresses the performative aspects of non-theatrical activity a recognition of the constructedness the fulfillment of quasi-aesthetic regulations gives insight into ordinary behaviorhowever I believe I do have a mandate as a theatre director to hypothesize the ways in which a culture defines differentiates “brackets” theatrical performance as the site in which imaginary worlds are built that relate to but differ from empirical realitythe “as if” conceptualization that theatre performances build up implemented through actual human beings is often stimulated by complex multivalent texts texts that metamorphose in performance adjusting to the idiosyncrasies of actors and directorial interventions
for me this phenomenon remains the principal element in my work
traditional theatre especially in the U.S. that conventional theatre framed by the proscenium has aged to become analogous to the performance of opera or the symphony… arcane performances addressed to elitist and uncurious audiences
performances of popular culture are rarely subversive relying on rigid and overused conventions framing the freedom of performance within the containing liminality of allowed suspension of the rules
it is true dramatic texts are univocal and repressive but my goal my hope in removing the theatrical walls creating site specific paratheatrical performancesbThe term “paratheatre” was coined by the late Polish theatre director, Jerzy Grotowski, to address a highly dynamic and visceral approach to performance that aimed to erase traditional divisions between spectators and performers. Paratheatre was also executed outdoors in the forests of Poland as non-performance events. After 1975, Grotowski withdrew from theatre entirely as a public performance medium to redirect his focus towards non-performance oriented group dynamics that developed through various stages: Paratheatre (1969-78), Theatre of Sources (1976-1982), Objective Drama (1983-86), and Art as Vehicle (1986-present). Grotowski’s work continues today at the Workcenter of Jerzy Grotowski and Thomas Richards in Pontedera, Italy. complicate the chosen text and establish sites of material energy
of course simply taking the “performance” outside the theater does not make this happen performers must find new techniques designers new aesthetic models and the audience…
Iser positions fiction by claiming that narrative is not mimetic, not a representation of empirical reality but that narrative puts forward the details of an imaginary that we conceptualize in the processes of reading. That imaginary world allows us to conceptualize what is, in the world of empirical reality, inaccessible. We challenge the empirical through putting the imaginary up against the empirical. The separation between the imaginary and the empirical allows us to juxtapose the two and, through that juxtaposition, witness their interaction.
The term “paratheatre” was coined by the late Polish theatre director, Jerzy Grotowski, to address a highly dynamic and visceral approach to performance that aimed to erase traditional divisions between spectators and performers. Paratheatre was also executed outdoors in the forests of Poland as non-performance events. After 1975, Grotowski withdrew from theatre entirely as a public performance medium to redirect his focus towards non-performance oriented group dynamics that developed through various stages: Paratheatre (1969-78), Theatre of Sources (1976-1982), Objective Drama (1983-86), and Art as Vehicle (1986-present). Grotowski’s work continues today at the Workcenter of Jerzy Grotowski and Thomas Richards in Pontedera, Italy.
Jan 27, 2015 | Categories: Speculation | Tags: Jean Genet, Notes | Comments Off on performativity of ordinary behavior
images go through a variety of mediations in the course of rehearsal as my perception collides with that of collaborators some in particular catch my imagination confound and complicate my perception of the overall work I can shape an individual image fashion the field in which that image is set at play manipulate the containing image of space (the performance space) to a limited degree as well as the relationship of the individual elements within the performed spacebut with site specific work even with this general sense of control a provocative degree of accidents occur randomness surpriseconstructed images interrelationships the preconceived structure of the field of play undergoes unexpected reconfigurations magical transformationsadd to this the interactions of actors and a text these unexpected mediations make the rehearsal process a volatile experience a place where predetermined notions collide with the unforeseen sometimes unwelcome transformations
yet i find these collisions produce some of the most significant and meaningful mediations opening doors to potentialities unimagined prior
my private or self-contained vision when made public through conversation with collaborators soemtimes through photographs taken during the communal rehearsal process shared and displayed either overtly or indirectly this vision of mine opens itself up sometimes willingly sometimes unwillingly to an extensive series of challenges complicated negotiations internal and external as it encounters both the imagination and the bodily presence of collaborating visions
my subjective vision in this process constantly evolves as the virtual performance of my imagination is re-shaped by others material work enveloped by the idiosyncrasies of environment framed an unframed by a sites nature all of which produce a new virtuality that in turn is re-shaped in the day by day process of an evolving aesthetic project
this is the inevitable dynamic between plan and implementation mental image and physical embodiment execution of a determined scheme and the surprise accommodation of the accidental
this is a relationship between a perceived failure and a recuperation with change
these challenges and subsequent revisions in plan occur even in aesthetic projects like painting that involve only a single person
in collective/collaborative work these mediations of an “original” vision or imaginative plan increase in both number and intensity this process may be perceived as one complicated by the relationship between conscious motive and the operation of a collective unconscious where the sudden discovery of a structure a paradigm a cluster of images in a particular relationship appear to be the display of an organizational scheme that the collaborative process of work brings to the surface
these surprise revelations of unplanned relationships occur all the time how one interprets them depends upon your conception of the imagination
the performance space as a form of consciousness be it San Francisco’s Old Mint the Emeryville mudflats becomes a manifestation a 3d model of consciousness stimulating a consistent conceptual play that prevents the work from being merely an imitation of behavior
it isn’t particularly useful to tell an actor that he or she is “performing a specific, albeit complex, image within a larger image of consciousness” it is useful, to view the presence of a human figure not as a discrete image but as a mediation– as an image that a consciousness has already processed not as the raw material of sense perception
I recognize I have not control nor no idea how a spectator will process that image but the degree to which I can shape that image as a processed or mediated image this emphases provides a unique stimulus for the spectator
In this way of working the performance unfolding in space but most importantly AS space operates much like a vision or dream capturing consciousness holding it within its borders constituting itself as images that shape the spectator’s consciousness for the moment of performance
each spectator negotiates his or her own relationship to that vision but, if I consider that the work provides a series of visual and acoustic images stimulating the individual spectator the process is rather self-consciously phenomenlogical
Theatre is a process of vital divergence from everyday life: it does not simply reflect the everyday but as with the simplest pedestrian dance diversifies its habitual patterns and opens its place of occurrence to the imagination. Alan Read, Theatre and Everyday Life, 1993
while Post-structuralism exhausted itself as a aesthetic/analytic strategy its premises continue to resonate
Derrida’s removal of the idiosyncratic writer as a stable object of study as the premise on which I would read a series of texts may seem too cold for those who find it difficult to read dramatic works outside the notion of a textual series set apart from other texts through an idea of authorship my hypothetical reconstruction of playwright/subject
grows even more problematic
I recognize my need
or maybe it’s just a desire…
to construct an idea of an author
but this project seems
hypothetical
transitive
complicit in the dynamics of ideology
I can easily identify
the irreconcilable differences among
Coleridge’s Shakespeare
Bradley’s Shakespeare
Wilson Knight’s Shakespeare
Arthur Harbage’s Shakespeare
Stephen Greenblatt’s Shakespeare
or Sartre’s Genet
Bernard Frechtman’s Genet
Edmund White’s Genet
I understand each of these Shakespeares
each of these Genets
is inextricably implicated
in one of a series of present moments
in which an aesthetic premise
provided the method of authorial construction
even the collision of the unconscious
Derrida’s chance
and the predetermination of codified systems
constitutes a model of author
in its image of that aspect of the psyche
that is either most free
(of rational control)
or most bound
(to the accidents of unconscious determination)
coming into contact
with the externally given structures of language
my reluctance
to leave the post-structural game of displacing the subject
is Derrida’s fault
Derridean instability
offers an attractive model
in my thinking about the rehearsal process
as I prepare for a future performance
I enjoy
(as well as fear)
the instability of the process
where I can offer or accept
almost any interpretative act
as a possibility for a moment
what is least pleasurable for me
is that moment
where I trade that instability
for the relative permanence of a fixed point of interpretation
that moment
at which I begin the process of constructing a performance
defining the parameters of a site
limiting the play
the freedom of the actors
and myself
at this point
as artists
we cease playing
initiating a series of repetitions
in order to write the selected rhythms
tempos
movements
and inflections
into the space, the actors and the musicians
that I
as director
think most satisfactory
this is the moment when I am most self-conscious
about inscribing “myself” into the performance
through imposing limits on others
appropriating the work to my own purposes
and foregrounding myself as an authority
this discomfort
occasioned by my knowledge
of the arbitrariness of interpretation as an activity
often provokes me
to de-stabilize the performance structurally
foregrounding
for a spectator
the idea of the event as a performance
just a “take” on the text
not a definitive “reading” of the text
on the other hand
I am equally discomfited
by the inability of an audience
a colleague
a friend
a mentor
to recognize the
“validity”
“timeliness”
“perceptiveness”
“originality”
even “veracity”
of my “take”
I am like Malvolio’s perception of the “boy” Cesario
within “standing water, between boy and man”
caught at that moment between a changing tide
I apprehend the possibility
of a reconstitution of the subject
yet I wear my sense of myself and the playwright
as reconstituted subjects
somewhat in the way
the boy actor In the original productions of this play a male actor played Viola: a female character who disguises herself as a man wears the male clothes provided to Viola
as I dress myself in the related concepts of an authorial
and an interpretating subject
I am putting on a costume
with which I am naturally familiar
in my non-theoretical/academic
modes of speaking and thinking
these are the clothes I wear off-stage
yet
to fulfill the game of the performance
I must not wear these clothes with an apparent ease and naturalness
but rather inhabit the garments as though they belonged to the opposite
the sexual other
and yet
within the game itself
I find alignments between role and self
that make the “alien” quality of the stage costume
seem precisely that
unnatural
an arbitrary and temporary disguise
not the familiar dress that the irony of the convention calls for
I find a third sex
an androgyny that makes either role, Viola or Cesario
seem to be a construct formed for the relational structure
that the conventions of comedy demand
somewhere in the movement between Viola and Cesario
that moment in between childhood and adulthood
I’ve lost my confidence in what that maturity may be
if it will be more authentic
than the ambiguous role this performance elicits
anticipation calculation presumption in performance
Dec 20, 2014 | Categories: Speculation | Tags: Notes | Comments Off on anticipation/calculation/presumption
We ought to dance with rapture that we should be alive and in the flesh, and part of the living, incarnate cosmos. I am part of the sun as my eye is part of me. That I am part of the earth my feet know perfectly, and my blood is part of the sea. My soul knows that I am part of the human race, my soul is an organic part of the great human soul, as my spirit is part of my nation. In my own very self, I am part of my family. There is nothing of me that is alone and absolute except my mind, and we shall find that the mind has no existence by itself, it is only the glitter of the sun on the surface of the waters. D.H. Lawrence, Apocalypse and the Writings on Revelation
Faeries, come take me out of this dull world, For I would ride with you upon the wind, Run on the top of the dishevelled tide, And dance upon the mountains like a flame. W.B. Yeats, The Land of Heart’s Desire
It is not upon you alone the dark patches fall, The dark threw its patches down upon me also, The best I had done seem’d to me blank and suspicious, My great thoughts as I supposed them, were they not in reality meagre? Nor is it you alone who know what it is to be evil, I am he who knew what it was to be evil, I too knitted the old knot of contrariety, Blabb’d, blush’d, resented, lied, stole, grudg’d, Had guile, anger, lust, hot wishes I dared not speak, Was wayward, vain, greedy, shallow, sly, cowardly, malignant, The wolf, the snake, the hog, not wanting in me, The cheating look, the frivolous word, the adulterous wish, not wanting, Refusals, hates, postponements, meanness, laziness, none of these wanting, Was one with the rest, the days and haps of the rest, Was call’d by my nighest name by clear loud voices of young men as they saw me approaching or passing, Felt their arms on my neck as I stood, or the negligent leaning of their flesh against me as I sat, Saw many I loved in the street or ferry-boat or public assembly, yet never told them a word, Lived the same life with the rest, the same old laughing, gnawing, sleeping,
Play’d the part that still looks back on the actor or actress, The same old role, the role that is what we make it, as great as we like, Or as small as we like, or both great and small. Walt Whitman, Crossing Brooklyn Ferry
Sailing on San Francisco Maritime’s Schooner Alma. My belief assumed a form that it commonly assumes among the educated people of our time. This belief was expressed by the word “progress.” At the time it seemed to me that this word had meaning. Like any living individual, I was tormented by questions of how to live better. I still had not understood that in answering that one must live according to progress, I was talking just like a person being carried along in a boat by the waves and the wind; without really answering, such a person replies to the only important question-“Where are we to steer?”-by saying, “We are being carried somewhere.” Leo Tolstoy, A Confession
The idea behind the Franconia Performance Salon is to share sketches or segments of works in progress; drink some wine, and talk about the work. Don’t come expecting a “show” but rather a piece of something in process that you can respond to with feedback.