- Hide menu

Heterogeneous Spectacles

Sophocles Speechless Fish

Speechless Fish, I call it. Informally. Because sometimes the informal is all you’ve got when you’re dealing with theatrical ghosts that ancient, scraps of text that survived fires, floods, the general amnesia of civilization. This is part of something bigger, something I’m calling IOTA, which sounds either pretentious as hell or like the most honest thing I’ve ever attempted, depending on your tolerance for resurrecting dead Greek dramatists. Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides,the holy trinity of tragedy, most of whose work is just… gone. Vanished. And here I am, trying to breathe some kind of temporary life into what’s left.

The fish were dead. Obviously. Eight of them lined up on that fence like a jury that had already reached its verdict. They weren’t props, they were collaborators. Silent witnesses. The Greek chorus that couldn’t sing. And maybe that’s the point. Maybe Sophocles, wherever he is in the cosmic void, gets a kick out of dead fish speaking his words through their very inability to speak. The irony is so thick you could choke on it.

Two and a half minutes. That’s all it took. That’s all it takes, really, to say something true about the human condition if you’re not padding it with bullshit. The ancient Greeks understood economy, they knew that sometimes the fragment is more powerful than the whole, that incompleteness can devastate you in ways that resolution never could.

And the audience? Three people. Three. One of them was… well, someone who had to be there. But the other two? Hell’s Angels. I’m not making this up. Two actual Hell’s Angels showed up to watch a performance of a lost Sophocles fragment involving dead fish on a fence in San Gregorio on a partly cloudy afternoon three days before Christmas.

You can’t plan for that kind of perfection. You can’t manufacture that collision of high culture and American outsider mythology. It just happens, or it doesn’t. This time, it did. And for two and a half minutes, under that indecisive sky, something ancient and something immediate existed in the same space, and nobody knew quite what to do with it except let it be what it was: strange, fleeting, and probably unrepeatable.

Speechless Fish, Site Specific Art, Environmental Art, Art Research, Fish Art, Ephemeral performance silence, San Gregorio California history, Dead fish theatrical collaborators

The Fragment…
A chorus of speechless fish made a din
saluting their dear mistress
with their tails

.

The Location…So Father Juan Crespi shows up on Tuesday, October 24, 1769, dragging his Franciscan ass through the coastal brush, and he’s got his diary out, scribbling notes like he’s some kind of eighteenth-century Yelp reviewer with a crucifix. “Fine place,” he writes. Good lands. Abundance of water. Translation: this would make an excellent mission, meaning an excellent place to fundamentally alter the trajectory of Indigenous existence. He names it San Pedro Regalado, after some patron saint nobody outside the Catholic hierarchy remembers, because that’s what you do when you’re convinced God sent you to California to plant flags in other people’s soil.The blackberries are so thick they can’t walk. Seven hours of travel gets them two leagues, which tells you everything about the terrain and probably the condition of their feet. They arrive at a “camping place”, Crespi’s words, not mine, where there’s a village of what he calls “heathen,” because apparently not being Christian in 1769 means you don’t get a better noun. These people receive the Spanish with “much friendliness,” which is either genuinely hospitable or the greatest example of not-yet-knowing-what’s-coming in California history. Fair-skinned, well-formed, some bearded. Living near the beach, about half a league from where the missionaries set up camp, with seasonal houses in the valley. They’ve got an arroyo running through the middle, plenty of water heading to the ocean, and the only problem Crespi can identify is the scarcity of wood. But hey, mountains nearby, redwood brush everywhere. Problem solved.

Fast forward through the Mexican era: the place becomes Rancho San Gregorio, named after Pope Gregory I, because why stop with one layer of Catholic nomenclature when you can pile on another?

By the 1850s, San Gregorio’s transformed into a resort town for wealthy San Franciscans who apparently had nothing better to do than take bone-rattling stagecoach rides to something called San Gregorio House for fishing, hunting, sea bathing, boat races, the full menu of Victorian leisure activities for people with disposable income and time to kill.

That building’s still standing. So is The General Store, operating since 1889, which means it’s been selling… whatever people needed… for over a century. Witness to everything.
What Crespi didn’t write about, what never makes it into the missionary diaries or the resort brochures, is the Chinese community that lived along the creek in the nineteenth century until heavy rains washed their buildings into oblivion. Erased. Just gone. As if they were never there.

By 1915, the community’s running seven cheese factories. Seven. From missionary outpost to resort destination to dairy hub in a hundred and fifty years. That’s the American trajectory in miniature: repurpose, reinvent, forget what came before, move on.

Gerald Casel Spinters in Our Ankles

Gerald Casel Dance: Spinters in Our Ankles at ODC…

Gerald Casel, ODC, Splinters, san francisco dance, san francisco performance, dance photography, dance documentation, jamie lyons, san francisco art, Gerald Casel ODC, Gerald Casel choreography

Splinters in Our Ankles

Gerald Casel’s Splinters in Our Ankles is a contemporary movement essay that responds to the colonial origins and collective cultural amnesia imbued in the Philippine folk dance, Tinikling.  Choreographed and directed by Gerald Casel, this evening-length premiere is created in collaboration with dancers Arletta Anderson, Kristen Bell, Christina Briggs-Winslow, Rebecca Chaleff, Janet Collard, Peiling Kao, Kevin Lopez, and Parker Murphy, with original music composed and performed by Tim Russell and lighting and media design by Jack Beuttler.

Let us read, and let us dance;
these two amusements will never do any harm to the world.
Voltaire

2 + 2 = 22: Man Ray’s Hollywood Equations

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

King Lear

Here’s the thing about Man Ray sitting in Hollywood in 1948, chain-smoking and staring at photographs he took a decade earlier of nineteenth-century plaster shapes that some French mathematician built to explain shit that nobody except twelve people in the world could actually understand, it’s the most beautiful kind of fuck-you to meaning itself.

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, canvas painting, Much Ado About Nothing

Much Ado About Nothing

Think about it. The guy’s in exile. All of Europe’s best minds are washing up on the California shore like interesting debris, drinking too much at parties with Stravinsky and Buñuel, pretending they’re not drowning in ennui while the orange trees bloom and the studio system grinds out its dreams. And Man Ray looks at these photographs, these mathematical models, curves and surfaces and impossible geometries that exist purely to make the invisible visible, to give form to abstraction, and he says, essentially…

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, art work, Hamlet

Hamlet

“Yeah, these are like Hamlet.”

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, Oil Painting, Macbeth

Macbeth

Not because they are. That’s the whole goddamn point. He writes “2 + 2 = 22” on a blackboard behind one of them like some kind of Zen koan cooked up by a hungover dadaist. He plays games getting people to match the paintings to the plays and doesn’t give a shit when they get it wrong, sometimes they got it right; sometimes of course, they didn’t, and it was just as well!

Because what he’s really painting, what he’s been painting since he put a camera down and picked up a brush again, is the space between things. The gap where meaning should be but isn’t. Where mathematics dead-ends into beauty. Where Shakespeare’s human equations of jealousy and murder and love become these white plaster things, these mute witnesses to their own incomprehensibility.

Oil Painting, Merchant of Venice, Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

Merchant of Venice

And André Breton warned Man Ray not to show the paintings next to the actual mathematical models, said the art would get “definitely outclassed.” He was right, of course. You can’t beat mathematics for stark beauty. But that wasn’t the point either. The point was the translation itself, the impossible journey from equation to photograph to painting to Twelfth Night, each step further from any source you could pin down, each transformation more gorgeously, willfully absurd.

Oil Painting, Twelfth Night, Man Ray Shakespeare Equations

Twelfth Night

Man Ray took objects designed for pure reason and turned them into headless torsos, into skulls that look like breasts, into theatrical tableaux where the only drama is the refusal of sense. He made beauty out of estrangement. In Hollywood. During wartime. While Europe burned.

Oil painting, William Shakespeare, As You Like It

As You Like It

His tombstone says “unconcerned, but not indifferent,” and yes, that’s it exactly. That’s the whole Shakespeare Equations hustle in five words. Not indifferent to beauty, to form, to the ecstatic collision of incompatible things. But utterly unconcerned with whether any of it adds up.

Man Ray Shakespeare Equations, oil painting, Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar

criticism, photography and performance

what is the objective
for both performance photography
and critical discourse? 

to inform the reader’s/viewer’s understanding of a performance?

each produces a “text”
offered as a substitute for the performance
an individual “reading”
an adjunct
a document
that can be shelved
with a copy of the original text of the play

critical essays and photographs
remain separate
but related artifacts to the performance

the production
at the moment of performance
is co-extensive with the originating text
while critical essays and photographs
are supplementary to the original text
potentially recalled
consulted
the next time the reader/audience member
encounters the original text
or subsequent performance

performance appropriates the original text
a spectator receives text and performance simultaneously
a fancier
hopefully clearer statement might be
a spectator receives the text
through the instrumentality of the performance

critical essays and photographs
have a freedom to stand apart from the original text
apart from the performance
the production
use that text/performance/production
as objective presence
as the stimulus to its own subjective response

directors do
at least the ones I gravitate towards
seek strategies to distance both themselves
and their audiences from a text
isolating its strangeness
archaic qualities
yet
one component of the raw material of performance
an ever present element
remains the original text
in my roles as a director
I’ve found it
extremely difficult with performance
to separate text and interpretation

a critic may develop an argument inductively
conventions of critical discourse allow a critic
to put forward an interpretation
in a straightforward way

a director
speaks primarily
through accoustic and visual systems
which he or she appropriates from
the original text

performance manifests
an overt collaboration between many individuals

the photographic document
more often than not
represents the singular vision of a photographer

critical discourse
as well
tends to represent the single voice of the critic

the previous statements
regarding photographers and critics
ignore the fact
that the work
criticism/photography
is frequently the result of
extended conversation with
collaborators
editors
colleagues
teachers and students
lovers
as well
it is difficult to imagine a kind of discourse
less derivative than
photography and criticism

the form of a critical essay
as with photographic documentation of live art
most often functions as a serial artifact
a unit in a sequence of writing or documents
within the critic’s/photographer’s own work
within a sub-genre of discourse shared by others

the photographer
the writer of a critical essay
have more direct control over the product
than a director whose work is vulnerable
to modification during rehearsals and performance
because they operate
through and with
the aesthetic sensibilities
the abilities of others

while a director
may make visual reference to other texts
by the original author
or others
performance
(in most cases)
remains a discrete representation of a single text

critical discourse often asks its readers
to perceive an aesthetic text
as one in a series rather than as
an independent aesthetic phenomenon

the principal objective of a critical essay
may be, for example
to position a text within a canon
that cuts across time
aligns the individual work with a group of works
identifying a play as a tragicomedy
a dark comedy
a drama of the grotesque
aim to make the individual text
comprehensible as a unit in a series
this type of critical act explicates
vivifies the text
only by establishing the coordinates
of the context that contains it

theater companies
may place a production in a serial position
one unit in a series
in a festival situation
but the individual performance
usually remains an experience
discrete
accessible
to those who attend only a single production

in performance
the text is tied
to the presence of the living actor
with an individual physical form
a unique personality

the critical discourse
is not tied to the specificity of the actual actor
nor to a specific occasion
a reader’s experience of the essay may be fragmented
divided among a series of moments
with extended periods of time in between
in which the mind processes
re-works the ideas encountered away from the text in question
the critical discourse

the photographer is held
within the specific place and time of the performance
they document
experiencing the theatrical interpretation as a whole
the photographer may return to document another performance
but the interpretation of the performance
is accessible primarily through
the data of performance that the photographer can remember
or in my practice
built up over the period of rehearsals

the critical discourse positions itself
in most cases
in the context of critical interpretations of the play
genre
historical period
contributing
self-consciously
to a body of criticism

as the field develops
hopefully
this will soon be true for
performance documentation
as there is no defined
body of documentation

The Clean Loneliness

What is that feeling when you’re driving away from people and they recede on the plain till you see their specks dispersing? – it’s the too-huge world vaulting us, and it’s good-bye. But we lean forward to the next crazy venture beneath the skies.
Jack Kerouac, On the Road

The thing about Thanksgiving is that everyone has somewhere to be. And that, if you play it right, makes it the perfect day to be absolutely fucking nowhere.

San Diego. Her family’s place. Turkey and stuffing and all those warm, promises of belonging. She’d asked me three weeks ago, casual. “So, Thanksgiving. I’m going down to my fathers’. In San Diego. You could… I mean, if you want to come, you’re welcome.”

You’re welcome. Not “I want you there.” Not “come with me.” You’re welcome. Like I’m a coworker who might not have plans. Like she’s checking a box.

The timing’s shit, is the thing. We’ve been dating, three months? Four? Long enough that ignoring Thanksgiving would’ve been weird. Not long enough that Thanksgiving together was obvious. We hit that threshold right as the holidays started bearing down, and suddenly we’re both doing this awkward dance of “what are we” meets “what do we do about Thursday.”

Maybe she wanted me there. Maybe she was just doing what you do when you’re in that murky territory between casual and something else, and the calendar forces your hand. Maybe her dad asked if she was seeing anyone, and she said yes, and her dad said well bring him, and now here we are, both wondering if this is too much too soon but neither of us willing to say it.

Which is exactly why I’m here, alone, on a thirty-two-foot sloop in the middle of the goddamn Bay.

The city’s empty. Everyone’s inside, fulfilling obligations and calling them traditions. The bridge hangs there in the distance, rust-red against the grey, as uncommitted as I am. The water’s cold. The wind’s picking up. And I am, for better or worse, choosing honest solitude over polite uncertainty.

Because what’s worse than being alone on Thanksgiving? Being at someone’s family table, wondering if you’re supposed to be there. Making small talk with her dad while you both wonder if you’ll even know each other’s names in six months. Smiling for the brother.  Playing house before you know if there’s a house to play in.

Thanksgiving sailing adventure, Relationship uncertainty, Choosing solitude over company, San Francisco Bay, Honest loneliness vs complicated warmth

The sails snap and fill. The boat heels. And I’m doing what I always do, choosing the clean loneliness over the complicated warmth.

She texted this morning. Early. “Have a great day.” Not “wish you were here.” Not “you’re missing out.” Just… have a great day. Like she gets it. Or like she’s relieved. Hard to tell the difference when you’re both being so fucking polite about everything.

Maybe she’s sitting at that table right now, perfectly happy I’m not there. One less thing to explain. One less person to worry about. No awkward introductions to a guy who might not stick around. Or maybe she’s hurt. Maybe she’s wondering what kind of asshole picks a boat and a dog over her family, over her. Maybe this is the moment she decides I’m not worth the trouble.

The sun’s getting lower. The wind’s getting colder. And somewhere in San Diego, there’s a woman who deserves someone who doesn’t overthink everything. Who just shows up. Who doesn’t turn a simple holiday invitation into an existential crisis on a sailboat.

But she’s also the woman who said “you’re welcome” instead of “please come,” and maybe that means she gets it too. Maybe we’re both not quite ready. Maybe the timing really is just shit, and we’re both out here, her at her father’s table, me on this boat, doing the best we can with a situation neither of us knows how to navigate.

I point the bow toward the Berkeley marina. The day’s almost over. The holiday’s almost done.

Tonight we’ll talk, we talk every night..

One more day alone. Then we’ll see.

J’aime bien les couchers de soleil

WANDERLUST: Bolinas sunset…

Bolinas, sunset
 
J’aime bien les couchers de soleil. Allons voir un coucher de soleil…
I am very fond of sunsets. Come, let us go look at a sunset…
Antoine de Saint Exupéry, Le Petit Prince (1943)

fox mirror forest

‘Change life! ‘Change society!’
These precepts mean nothing without the production of an appropriate space.
Henri Lefebvre

Leica, Iron, and Invisible Rain: Eiffel Tower the Day Before Chernobyl, April 1986

Étant la plus saisissante manifestation de l’art des constructions métalliques par lesquelles nos ingénieurs se sont illustrés en Europe, elle est une des formes les plus frappantes de notre génie national moderne.
Gustave Eiffel

Here I am with this gorgeous Leica M2 I scored at some outdoor market in Marseille, and I’m pointing it at the most photographed hunk of iron in human history, thinking I’m capturing something, anything, that matters. In fact, I’m pretty sure this is the only photo that came out on that role of film.

And I was. Just not what I thought.

Because twenty-four hours later, we’re hearing about Chernobyl, and suddenly that rain we were dancing in, that atmospheric bullshit I was breathing while framing my shot, might be laced with cesium-137 and all the other greatest hits from the Soviet nuclear playlist. The tower’s still standing there, immortal and indifferent, while invisible particles are doing their slow-motion Nagasaki routine on my DNA.

Paris, France, Eiffel tower, Gustave Eiffel, Chernobyl radioactive rain Europe,
That’s the thing about cameras, about freezing moments: they lie by telling the truth. That frame says “April 1986, Paris, beauty, permanence, look at this marvelous structure.” It doesn’t say “the world is ending 1,500 miles east and I don’t know it yet.” Doesn’t say “I’m all contaminated and laughing about it.”

The Eiffel Tower’s been there since 1889, survived two world wars, outlasted everyone who built it. My Leica caught it on film while invisible poison drifted west. Both machines, doing what they do: bearing witness, preserving evidence, marking time.

And here I am, decades later, still here. Those rain clouds hopefully came from Norway or Sweden rather than the Ukraine. The tower, the photo, me, survivors of everything that tried to kill us, most notably our own beautiful, reckless ignorance.

Chocolate Heads Building Scene ⎪Space Launch

Stanford McMurtry Art and Art History Building: Chocolate Heads Site Specific Dance Building Scene : Space Launch!

Chocolate Heads, Aleta Hayes, McMurty Art and Art History Building, site specific dance, performance documentation, Stanford Dance, Stanford photography, Stanford TAPS, Stanford Arts, Stanford theater and performance studies, dance photography, San Francisco dance, Stanford Art and Art History, Stanford McMurtry Art and Art History

The modern artist is living in a mechanical age and we have a mechanical means of representing objects in nature such as the camera and photograph. The modern artist, it seems to me, is working and expressing an inner world – in other words – expressing the energy, the motion and the other inner forces… the modern artist is working with space and time, and expressing his feelings rather than illustrating.
Jackson Pollock

Surfing Fort Point

But surfing always had this horizon, this fear line, that made it different from other things, certainly from other sports I knew. You could do it with friends, but when the waves got big, or you got into trouble, there never seemed to be anyone around.
William FinneganBarbarian Days: A Surfing Life

Look at that shit, man in a wetsuit under the Golden Gate, Alcatraz looming like some brick middle finger to freedom, and he’s out there chasing walls of cold Pacific death. Finnegan nailed it: that fear line, that horizon where all your friends disappear and it’s just you and the void and the question of whether you’re brave or stupid or both.

Surfing Fort Point, fort point surfing 2Surfing Fort Point, fort point surfing 1

This is what we’re always chasing, isn’t it? That place where the noise stops. Where Instagram can’t follow. Where it’s not about being seen but about seeing yourself stripped down to ligament and breath and the animal calculation of when to paddle, when to dive, when to let the beast pass over you.

Fort Point. A Civil War relic nobody remembers, waves nobody wants, water so cold it’ll shrink your soul. And still they go. Because somewhere between that brick fortification and that island prison, between the infrastructure of control and the infrastructure of punishment, there’s this third thing, this moment of almost-drowning that feels more alive than anything your carefully curated life will ever offer you.

The fear line. The place where you can’t fake it anymore. Where authenticity isn’t a marketing term but a prerequisite for survival. That’s the real spectacle, one person, one wave, zero audience.

×